CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We leave the BIOS settings at default and memory at JEDEC for the supported frequency of the processor for these tests, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

Rendering - Blender 2.78: link

For a render that has been around for what seems like ages, Blender is still a highly popular tool. We managed to wrap up a standard workload into the February 5 nightly build of Blender and measure the time it takes to render the first frame of the scene. Being one of the bigger open source tools out there, it means both AMD and Intel work actively to help improve the codebase, for better or for worse on their own/each other's microarchitecture.

Rendering: Blender 2.78

In our Blender results, the Gaming 7 Pro sits on the upper-middle side of the results completing the benchmark in 203 seconds. This data point again shows the CPU able to clock up to the 3.6 GHz value we see most boards tackle this testing at. 

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7

POV-Ray often becomes sensitive to immediate frequency, with the MCE boards taking the lead. The Gaming 7 Pro scores right in the middle of the pack at 4,622.  The CPU boosted to 3.6 GHz like many others do in this testing outside of the EVGA boards who revert back to base clock for whatever reason. 

Compression – WinRAR 5.4: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.40

WinRAR results put the AORUS X299 Gaming 7 Pro in the lower-middle part of the pack here at 35.2 seconds. 

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

Encoding: 7-Zip

The 7-Zip results land the AORUS offering in the middle of the very tightly packed datasets. In this test, the CPU boosted to 4GHz as did the majority in this group. The outlier was by our MSI top result, but was repeatable. 

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

Similarly, the 3DPM result puts the AORUS board in the middle of the pack. During this test it performs six mini tests with a 10-second gap between them: our result were from a 3.6 GHz CPU clockspeed during the test. 

Neuron Simulation - DigiCortex v1.20: link

The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. Results are taken during the steady state period in a 32k neuron simulation and represented as a function of the ability to simulate in real time (1.000x equals real-time).

System: DigiCortex 1.20 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

In the DigiCortex testing, the AORUS is wedged in with the other results with a 1.14 result and is part of a tightly packed set of data. The only outlier here is again the MSI Gaming Pro Carbon AC which seems to throw little caution to the wind for performance sake. 

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

29 Comments

View All Comments

  • dave_the_nerd - Friday, January 26, 2018 - link

    What the actual hell?

    The worst thing about my hobbies are, apparently, the other people who enjoy them.
  • Lord of the Bored - Saturday, January 27, 2018 - link

    Yup, that about sums it up.
  • cbm80 - Friday, January 26, 2018 - link

    Disco Stu will overclock you!
  • FreckledTrout - Sunday, January 28, 2018 - link

    Why don't we don't see RGB used for actual useful features like color coding with light the back ports like the audio ports etc?
  • Beaver M. - Sunday, January 28, 2018 - link

    Or LEDs at the back of the Monitor, changing colors according to the picture displayed.
    Oh wait, that already exists and is heavily copyrighted, so that only one manufacturer can use it and doesnt want it to take foot in gaming.
  • Gunbuster - Monday, January 29, 2018 - link

    Or even bother to sell a TV in the united states. Thanks Philips...
  • Gunbuster - Sunday, January 28, 2018 - link

    Aorus bro eagle is still not animated in LED lifting a dumbell...
  • BenJeremy - Monday, January 29, 2018 - link

    Just say no to X299's VROC scam. Intel has made a mess of its support for M.2 NVMe RAID-0 arrays, and boards built on this chipset are a hot mess. Even with the "proper" VROC key (assuming you can get one), you'll find that Intel LIED about supporting non-Intel NVMe storage for bootable RAID arrays.

    It pains me to say that... I've been an Intel fan for many, many years and was looking forward to seeing their RAID solution optimized for NVMe, but motherboard manufaturers rushed out motherboards last year that linked M.2 slots to DMI PCI-e lanes (chipset, not direct to CPU), and hampered the whole implementation with crappy BIOS software. The Asus Hyper-X M.2 card, that works well with non-Asus AMD-based motherboards fails to work on these Gigabyte motherboards, too...

    Maybe you all don't care about getting 20GB/sec throughput on your bootable storage, but if Intel is mucking up and outright lying about this, how confident can you be about the rest of their features?
  • wolfman3k5 - Thursday, April 26, 2018 - link

    I don't know exactly how GIGABYTE releases motherboards, because it seems that they keep every model for a very short time in production. While I can't find the X299 Designare EX or the Aorus Gaming 7 Pro anywhere in stock, I have found the GIGABYTE X299 Aorus Gaming 9 for sale on eBay: https://www.ebay.com/itm/173287187006 - and the price seems to be pretty good.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now