Gaming Tests: Chernobylite

Despite the advent of recent TV shows like Chernobyl, recreating the situation revolving around the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster, the concept of nuclear fallout and the town of Pripyat have been popular settings for a number of games – mostly first person shooters. Chernobylite is an indie title that plays on a science-fiction survival horror experience and uses a 3D-scanned recreation of the real Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. It involves challenging combat, a mix of free exploration with crafting and non-linear story telling. While still in early access, it is already picking up plenty of awards.

I picked up Chernobylite while still in early access, and was impressed by its in-game benchmark, showcasing complex building structure with plenty of trees and structures where aliasing becomes important. The in-game benchmark is an on-rails experience through the scenery, covering both indoor and outdoor scenes – it ends up being very CPU limited in the way it is designed. We have taken an offline version of Chernobylite to use in our tests, and we are testing the following settings combinations:

  • 360p Low, 1440p Low, 4K Low, 1080p Max

We do as many runs within 10 minutes per resolution/setting combination, and then take averages.

AnandTech Low Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Low Quality
High Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Max Quality
Average FPS

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

CPU Tests: Synthetic and SPEC Gaming Tests: Civilization 6
Comments Locked

210 Comments

View All Comments

  • alexane - Sunday, January 24, 2021 - link

    easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online. salary8 . com
  • MilaEaston - Tuesday, January 26, 2021 - link


    easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online. salary8 . com
  • flyingpants265 - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    Right. I'm not even sure why this is an issue. TDP stands for "thermal design power", it's how much power the chip uses, it's not debatable.
  • etal2 - Thursday, January 21, 2021 - link

    What I'm missing from this review is a benchmark running under intels recommended settings.
    From what I've seen often people see the 65w rating and go on to combine the i7-10700 with cheap B460/H470 motherboards and basic coolers.
  • Duraz0rz - Thursday, January 21, 2021 - link

    The problem here is that the turbo limit is not enforced by the chip, but by the mobo. So even cheap B460/H470 boards can set that limit to be higher than Intel's recommendations if they choose to. And no one that would be buying these boards will necessarily care to dig into the BIOS and set the limits themselves.
  • Cygni - Thursday, January 21, 2021 - link

    Yes, they would. There are lots of (admittedly niche) applications where outright sustained performance is less important that bursty performance in a limited thermal envelope, either due to space or ventilations issues. HTPCs, home servers, small industry applications, etc

    So yeah, i agree with the OP, I would have liked to have seen performance numbers at the "suggested" 65w PL1.
  • Calin - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    I totally agree with your comment, but what you ask for is a different article.
    Performance numbers in a strictly power limited environment - from Intel and AMD both (although Intel will be unfairly penalized by being three or so lithography generations behind).
  • Spunjji - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    "unfairly penalized"

    The product you test is the product they have on sale - that's not unfair in the context of a test designed to represent a specific real-world requirement.
  • olde94 - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    yeah i never heard anyone saing that amd was "unfairly penalized" in 2015. they could just "suck it up"
  • Spunjji - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    To be fair, some people did (GloFo's 28nm is terrible, I don't care about power, etc.) and I had no time for them either.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now