News hot off the wire is that Rivet Networks, the company behind the Killer range of accelerated networking products and analysis tools, is being acquired by Intel. The two companies have been working very closely of late, using a unified silicon strategy for the latest gigabit Ethernet networking silicon and also Wi-Fi 6 add-in cards and CNVi CRF modules for laptops. This new acquisition for Intel will enable an element of Ethernet traffic monitoring and optimization the portfolio has not had before, but it will be interesting to see how Intel hands the acquisition compared to when Qualcomm Atheros acquired Rivet Networks some years ago.

A lot of technology savvy users that have been around a while know about the Killer brand of networking products. The company originally burst onto the scene with an FPGA and a big heavy K heatsink looking to offer lower PC-to-Internet latencies, especially in games. Over time that FPGA became its own ASIC and gigabit Ethernet controller, and the company moved more into the ability to transparently detect and shape networking traffic, allowing high-priority traffic to pass through with the lowest latency, but downloads and streaming to get the lowest latency. Users were able to configure their network, as well as direct traffic through different networking interfaces if two Killer products were supported.

The original Bigfoot Killer NIC in 2006

The company originally started as Bigfoot Networks, and came to market with the Killer NIC in 2006. Qualcomm’s Atheros division, focused on networking, acquired the company in September 2011. The acquisition with Qualcomm gave a lot of access to Qualcomm’s ASIC building capabilities, bringing the power of the NIC down from an FPGA but also increasing the capability of the hardware and software. However, after several years of no product development or generational iterations, the original founders and engineers of the company spun back out of Qualcomm to form Rivet Networks, in an effort to build the Killer branding once again. Originally working with Qualcomm’s Atheros silicon, Rivet Networks started partnering with Intel and Realtek on various parts offering a standard version under the normal brand or the Killer version with additional network detection and shaping capabilities. This led to a resurgence in the capabilities of the hardware, with Dell, MSI, GIGABYTE, ASRock, and other OEMs becoming customers.

The Rivet Networks Killer AX1650, already built on Intel AX200 Silicon

When we saw a Killer NIC in the Dell XPS, the company had truly made it. Dell’s business machines also got access to SmartByte, a special app detection algorithm for Dell end-users and business customers. Rivet Networks have also developed a number of technologies to its portfolio, including supporting switch-like mechanics for multi-controller systems, or Wi-Fi extension services through time-muxing the Wi-Fi modem.

All these technologies will now fall under the Intel umbrella. The Rivet Networks team will join Intel’s Wireless Solutions Group within the Client Computing Group. Given that the two groups have been working very closely with the AX201 and Killer AX1650 networking chips recently, which underneath both use Intel silicon, it will be interesting to see where it all goes from here. I know of a number of plans that the Rivet team were working towards, some of them would be very beneficial to the consumer market, so I hope that Intel keeps the same passion alive.


This news is still breaking, we will update as we get more information


I had an on-the-record call with the Rivet Networks team and Intel, with lots of interesting information. While the value of the acquisition is not being disclosed, talks started in earnest at the end of last year about the right time and the level of synergy between the two companies. There is no mention of personnel, however every person that Intel offered a position too at Rivet took that offer. Rivet's CEO Mike Cubbage will now be Intel's Senior Director of Connectivity Innovations.

Intel is set to keep the Killer brand and integrate it into its portfolio of products. I asked if there were any particular brands that Intel was keen on or not keen on - Intel's Eric McLaughlin, VP and GM of the Wireless Group stated that Intel is interested in all of them, especially in how they've been deployed so far and how Intel can scale them in more places and different ways.

I did ask a question about the integration, given how when Rivet/Bigfoot Networks was acquired by Qualcomm and then had to spin out again in order to drive the product, I was worried Intel might do the same. Mike told me that Rivet's Killer brand strengths back then, and even today, are in the PC and Gaming space, which perfectly aligns with what Intel is focused on. This is different to the previous acquisition, where is was more of a business portfolio play, but this time around Intel looks set on developing the Killer technology into a wide variety of products at scale, something which Rivet wasn't able to do previously.


Source: Intel

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • jabber - Sunday, May 24, 2020 - link

    I remember when the Killer NICs came out there was one guy going round all the tech forums bigging up the Killer NIC and trying to intimidate anyone who criticised them. Used the same name everywhere. The name escapes me but it was pretty amusing to see someone shil so badly.
  • PeachNCream - Monday, May 25, 2020 - link

    At least one of the company's employees made a show of stepping into the comments for a few of Ian's recent articles at Killer NICs in an attempt to PR blast the unproven benefits of using one. I wouldn't be surprised if the shill was a company employee working either at the direction of leadership or on the side once it became clear that customers were not generally buying into the hype.

    Although I do still like the original Killer NIC. It had some interesting potential because, IIRC, it offloaded network stack processing to the FPGA/ASIC. It even ran some sort of lean OS independently of the rest of the PC (working from really old memories here so that might be all sorts of inaccurate). However, what the company evolved into over the years after acquisitions and changing hands multiple times is a bit of a disappointment in terms of what it attempts to sell as beneficial to the end user.

    Maybe Intel will do us all a favor and figure that out in the coming year or two and the graciously deposit the brand and flaky software it now sells into the waste bucket of failed tech gadgets. Killer NICs should live in the past with greatness things like the Zune.
  • Dragonstongue - Thursday, May 21, 2020 - link

    See, AMD needs to be doing things like this if they are to survive another onslaught to occur, locked out of other metrics.

    have always understood their was many a glaring problem for killer branded things, or at the very least, cause headaches for people.. not saying other things do not do this.. looking at you Gaming edge x570 branded Nahimic 2 crapware

    cool overstory though thank you
  • jabber - Sunday, May 24, 2020 - link

    What we really need is someone to do a big in-depth test of current NIC tech and see what really works and what is marketing BS. Realtek/Intel/Qualcom NICs...switch everything on/off/individual settings etc. Does the additional 'tweaking' software do anything? Best settings for throughput or latency etc. Switching on or off MS networking components. I haven't really seen an up to date comprehensive test for years.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now