On Screen Display

Before we dive into the actual display performance numbers, it makes sense to talk about NEC's OSD and a little bit about the in-monitor calibration option that's offered. 

Tapping the menu button brings up the OSD, but also enables some on-screen button labels that change accordingly as you move around inside. Rotate into portrait, and obviously buttons change - so too do the on-screen labels, which is awesome.

There are actually two sets of OSDs on the PA301w. The first is what you get when you hit menu, and is a nice (yet still comprehensive) skinned menu with pretty straightforward navigation. Settings for brightness, black, and eco mode are on the first tab, position and scaling are on the second, then color, tools, menu options, more eco settings, and finally the info tab. The second is the Advanced OSD I'll show in a moment.

What's awesome about the settings is that everything has units where possible - brightness can be changed from 40 to 400 nits, black levels can also be artificially increased to match an adjacent display. As I'll show in a second, after you've run the in-monitor calibration, if you select a specific number, it'll actually drive the display relatively close to where it should be. What a breath of fresh air compared to completely arbitrary percentages. 

Aspect ratio scaling options include full, aspect-correct, off (1:1), and custom, which is controlled from the advanced OSD. Inside the "RGB" tab are some basic color settings such as white point and simple color controls. Tools has PIP control if you want to use it, the USB port per video input mapping controls, some selection criteria for choosing video inputs, and off timer plus signaling. Menu tools is just OSD settings like position, color, and language. 

Inside "ECO" is some interesting stuff. Based on the configured price per kilowatt-hour, you can see the total electrical cost of using the monitor. In addition, based on the configured kg (of carbon) per kilowatt-hour, you can see how much carbon you've released indirectly. One field is for how much would've been used if you didn't have eco settings turned on, the other is how much you actually used. Both essentially enable some dynamic brightness based on ambient lighting measured on the front sensor - mode 1 corresponds to 200 nits of range, mode 2 corresponds to 100 nits. 

What about that "advanced OSD?" Well, you can get to it two ways. Under the color tab, at the bottom, is a link named "Advanced Settings." Pressing select on that will bring you there, or you can get there by turning on the monitor by holding power and input at the same time. Doing so then makes the menu button consistently bring up the advanced OSD for the duration of the power-on session. 

Inside are essentially the same options as the basic OSD, with more depth in the color/picture section and a few other places. White point and color tristimulus values are given in x and y, there's gamma control, and a new uniformity pane. If you're serious about getting color right, these are seriously useful. Initially however, things aren't that close to reality. Even though the white point is set at 6500K, we can see that measured value out of box is around 5600K. The color tristimulus points are also similarly completely wrong. 

This is where the in-monitor calibration is super handy, as it internally calibrates the monitor so these settings actually reflect reality instead of remain shifted by however much the monitor has drifted or differs from ideal. Initially, I spent lots of time tweaking the display color points in HCFR, shifting appropriately based on how much the numbers differed from measured. While that actually did yield better results, running the built-in calibration routine got me 90% of the way there in 1 minute instead of 1 hour like I'm used to doing manually. 

Internal calibration mode only works with x-rite i1D2 colorimeters. NEC has a rebranded version they sell in a bundle, or you can buy your own. Chances are if you're willing to spend $2k+ on an LCD, you're also willing to spend the $200 to get an i1D2. Again, it plugs into the right-side USB port. To get into calibration mode, either find stand-alone calibration in tab B of the menu, or press the left and right keys at the same time from the no signal screen. The display will initialize the sensor, then tell you to wait 30 minutes for the CCFL to settle - welcome to how long calibrating CCFL backlit displays usually takes in-between adjustments. 

After that, you can select "self" for self calibration, or "copy" mode to actually match another PA301w or another display entirely. The display will prompt you to stick the colorimeter in the center, then run through its tests. The actual set of tests seems very basic - red, green, blue, then a whitepoint and brightness test. It takes almost exactly one minute to run, then tells you it's all done. 

The results are awesome. After running through, the white point is much closer to the actual reported value, and the primary color tristimulus values are much closer to what they should be. Note below how the brightness value and color temperature value are now much closer than they were pre-calibration. 

The even better part is that the presets also now correctly work for mapping to different color spaces. If you try to use them without calibration, you risk being offset depending on how the monitor has drifted. I still ended up tweaking all six of the x y values for red green and blue, but they were much, much closer than before. 

Introduction and Hardware Impressions Viewing Angles and Color Quality
POST A COMMENT

92 Comments

View All Comments

  • 7Enigma - Wednesday, March 2, 2011 - link

    Are you seriously going to be frequently moving a 60+ pound display? Reply
  • erson - Tuesday, March 1, 2011 - link

    Great review Brian. Regarding Eizo current FlexScan 30" is getting pretty "old". Their brand new 27" SX2762W with dual displayports (v1.1a) looks more interesting for the pro-consumer I imagine.

    Any word of monitors with displayport v1.2 support for daisy-chaining?
    Reply
  • Conficio - Tuesday, March 1, 2011 - link

    instead of "The baddest..." Reply
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, March 1, 2011 - link

    No. Bad, worse, worst is correct if you're talking about a negative connotation, but if you're using bad like in "oh, he's a total bad-ass!" you would never say, "Yeah, but I'm a worse-ass!" LOL Reply
  • Luay - Tuesday, March 1, 2011 - link

    https://www.hazro.co.uk/shop.html#ecwid:category=4...
    They sell in the UK but do ship overseas and are priced cheaper than any 2560x1600 out there. You will find reviews for their models in TFT central.
    Reply
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, March 1, 2011 - link

    If you're asking about reviews; I believe that with rare exceptions review models are provided by the manufacturer not bought by the anandtech staff; so unless Hazro offers to send a review sample they won't be reviewed here. Reply
  • eaw999 - Wednesday, March 2, 2011 - link

    warranty issues would be a pain for anyone overseas though. Reply
  • gammaray - Tuesday, March 1, 2011 - link

    2200$+ ...

    is this a freaking joke?
    Reply
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, March 1, 2011 - link

    It's the same price as the outgoing 3090. Ezio sells high end displays for a similar price. These aren't intended as high end consumer displays like the Dell/HP models. They're aimed at professional customers; typically commercial photographers, and video producers.

    A big part of the price is probably panel binning, not all panels in a batch are equal and the manufactures charge a big premium for the best of the lot (less variation, fewer dead pixels, etc).

    The image processor in the multisync 90 series added about $200 to the cost and was used to farther normalize variations across the panel so you didn't end up with things like a bright corner. I'd assume the current model's processor is less expensive, but probably not by a lot.

    Finally the price premium from all the extra features that don't matter to consumers pushes the total cost up higher, since it cuts into the total customer base. $1300 vs $1800 is a big deal for a consumer on a budget, $1800 vs $2300 is much less for a (typically corporate) customer who has a need for the best on the market.
    Reply
  • hp540 - Tuesday, March 1, 2011 - link

    $2200 is not a joke. Actually, it's a drop in the bucket - depending on your perspective.

    I'm not a radiologist, but I read films as part of my work. Our radiology workstations use dual Eizo monitors. 2 x $2200 doesn't even come close to the full cost of these stations - it's not the workstations. It's not the computer. Most of the money the hospital pays is for the PAX software licensing fees.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now