Intel SSD 710 and 720 Series Specifications Revealedby Kristian Vättö on June 15, 2011 3:55 PM EST
- Posted in
- Intel SSD 710
- Intel SSD 720
In our Intel roadmap article published in May, we shortly previewed Intel's upcoming 700 Series SSDs. Back then there wasn't much to talk about as very few specs were known. Today we have some additional details to share, thanks to German site ComputerBase.de.
|Intel SSD 700 Series|
|NAND type||25nm MLC-HET||34nm SLC|
|Interface||SATA 3Gb/s||PCIe 2.0|
|4KB read||35 000 IOPs||180 000 IOPs|
|4KB write||3 300 IOPs||56 000 IOPs|
|Security||AES-128 encryption||AES-256 encryption|
|Data path protection||LBA tag checking||End to end data protection|
I want to start off by saying that these SSDs are aimed at enterprise use. If you want an SSD for your gaming rig, you should look at our mid-range SSD roundup for example.
The Intel 700 Series is meant to replace the X25-E lineup, Intel's enterprise series, which hasn't been updated since late 2008 so it's long overdue. However, neither of these is an exact successor. The 710 Series is closer with its 2.5" form factor and SATA 3Gb/s. The 710 Series is actually pretty close to the 320 Series in terms of specs: sustained write is slightly higher but random performance is a bit lower. The biggest difference between the 320 and 710 series is the NAND type. 320 Series uses regular MLC that you can find inside any mainstream SSDs; 710 Series is Intel's first enterprise level SSD to use MLC NAND, but not just any kind of MLC—it will use MLC-HET NANDs. MLC-HET offers more write cycles per cell so longetivity is increased, which is crucial for enterprises. The only downside is that MLC-HET will only last for 3 months after all write cycles have been used, whereas normal MLC will last for 12 months. However, this shouldn't be an issue due to the increased amount of write cycles. For the record, MLC-HET with 20% over-provisioning (OP) appears to offer roughly 65 times greater endurance than normal MLC.
The 720 Series will be Intel's first PCIe SSD. To take full advantage of it, you will need at least a PCIe 2.0 x8 slot since a x4 slot will only provide up to 2GB/s while the 720 Series provides read speeds of up to 2.2GB/s. It will use 34nm SLC NANDs, which is pretty common for high-end enterprise SSDs due to SLC's much better endurance. The 720 Series promises up to 36PB (yes, as in 36000TB) of 8KB writes for the 400GB SSD. That is nearly 1000 times more durable than 25nm MLC and over 10 times more durable than 25nm MLC-HET.
|320 Series||710 Series||720 Series|
|Endurance (TB)||?||?||?||500/900 (20% OP)||1000/1300 (20% OP)||18000||36000|
|Reliability (MTBF-hours)||1.2 million||2.0 million||N/A|
One of the biggest and most needed upgrades from X25-E is the much better encryption support. X25-E offered only ATA password protection, which is way too vulnerable by today's standards, especially when considering that even the mainstream 320 Series supports 128-bit AES. 720 Series will take that one step even further by supporting 256-bit AES encryption. This is very important for enterprises handling confidential data; you don't want your data get into the wrong hands and you are ready to pay the premium for the best protection.
This update is essential for Intel to stay competitive in the enterprise SSD market. It has already been 2.5 years since the last update and when considering the progress of SSDs during this time, it's surprising that the update hasn't take place sooner. There isn't much news on the release schdule so the best we've got is what we have already posted: Q2'11 for 710 Series and Q4'11 for 720 Series SSDs. The 710 Series seems to be the low-end offering and it's basically the same as the 320 Series with improved endurance. The 720 Series, on the other hand, is an SSD for heavy enterprise use with features making it suitable for such use. OCZ has pretty much been the dominator of PCIe SSD market but Intel's 720 Series could offer some serious competition in the high-end PCIe SSD market.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
velis - Thursday, June 16, 2011 - linkWas this supposed to be a spam "commercial"?
It failed to impress me...
7Enigma - Thursday, June 16, 2011 - linkSomething tells me this jibberish post and the one below it are from the same person.....
Metaluna - Thursday, June 16, 2011 - linkI literally have no idea what you're talking about. What does voltage have to do with anything?
GeorgeH - Thursday, June 16, 2011 - linkOnly 2.2 GB/s? Please, I had a P4 rig in 2003 with the same amount of bandwidth.
Completely unrelated, does anybody want to loan me $10k or so? It's for a very good cause...
Kakkoii - Thursday, June 16, 2011 - linkI can loan you that in Monopoly $ if it's any consolation.
Kakkoii - Thursday, June 16, 2011 - linkI love quickly snapping up right.
xrror - Friday, June 17, 2011 - linkIt's not a bot, just normally he posts on semiaccurate... I had to do a doubletake when I couldn't find the bullseye ;)
ssj4Gogeta - Friday, June 17, 2011 - linkOMG Drashek strikes Anandtech!
Vengeful Giblets - Tuesday, June 21, 2011 - linkWhile I appreciate the desire to participate, Google Translate should not be used to make forum posts.