Read First: The HTC One M9 Review Part 1

A good amount of time ago, we posted part one of our HTC One M9 review, which gave a good idea of some critical aspects of the One M9’s performance and design. Unfortunately, due to HTC’s last minute software changes there was a need to redo some of our testing as the changes were quite significant for some key aspects of the user experience, which were effectively any situation where the SoC was in a thermally throttled situation and overall camera performance. I’ve finally finished redoing our testing of the One M9, so we can finish the review and get the full picture of the One M9’s performance. Normally, we’d start by discussing the design of the phone, but much of the review has already been finished with part one. Instead, we’ll start with sustained battery life tests.

Battery Life Continued

As previously detailed, our sustained battery life tests either strongly stress the CPU or GPU. For our GPU tests, we use GFXBench 3.0’s sustained GPU test, which runs the T-Rex benchmark on the display at its native resolution for an infinite rundown test. We didn’t have the modified test to present for a comparison between the two software builds, but we can get a pretty good sense for the changes that have occurred for final shipping software.

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

GFXBench 3.0 Performance Degradation

As one can see, the One M9 delivered somewhat impressive sustained performance with the pre-release build, but this resulted in almost dangerous skin temperatures and poor battery life on the order of 1.73 hours. The new update produced acceptable skin temperatures, but frame rate drops rather dramatically as skin temperature rises. The end performance actually ends up being quite similar to the One M8, but performance during the test is much higher than what we saw on the One M8.

BaseMark OS II Battery Life

BaseMark OS II Battery Score

In the Basemark OS II test, we can see that the One M9 seems to perform poorly. One might be able to argue that the A57s provide more performance, but simple logging shows that past the first 20 minutes the A57 cluster is either shut down or throttled to the minimum clock state, although the A53 cluster manages to stay at 1.56 GHz for the duration of the test. For reference, the One M8 manages to keep the active CPUs at around 1.5 GHz throughout the test.

PCMark - Work Battery Life

While Basemark OS II and GFXBench function as power virus tests, I wanted to get a good idea of performance somewhere between these rather extreme tests and the mostly display-bound web browsing test. To do this, I tested a few devices against PCMark’s work battery life benchmark, which shows that the One M9 seems to perform comparably when compared against the One M8. There is a noticeable difference in performance, but the gap isn’t all that big when compared to the M8. More interestingly is that the battery temperature sensor (which isn't necessarily on the battery) gets noticeably higher than the M8, on the order of 5-10C higher.

It’s a bit frightening to see that the gap in performance that we saw with the web browsing test remain. The effects of panel-self refresh would be greatly reduced in these short-running tests, so the differences here are mostly due to the SoC. The level of throttling I’ve seen here is pretty much unprecedented, which doesn’t help with the issue. Overall, the performance of Snapdragon 810 here is bad enough that I would genuinely consider Snapdragon 805 to be an improvement. I can’t help but wonder if this was inevitable though, as leaked roadmaps in the past suggested that Snapdragon 810 would’ve been a very different SoC.

Camera Architecture and UX
POST A COMMENT

127 Comments

View All Comments

  • jabber - Monday, April 6, 2015 - link

    Yeah I rarely make calls on my phone. Why bother to spend 5 minutes chatting needlessly when maybe two short and quick text messages will do the same.

    Just have no use for small talk in day to day stuff. People only really call if they have to.
    Reply
  • DanNeely - Monday, April 6, 2015 - link

    The name smartphone is increasing a mis-nomer. The phone capability is a gateway feature; but the more the average person uses one, the more it ceases to be a phone, and instead becomes a hand computer that includes voice calls in the me-too feature checklist section. If almost all you're doing are voice calls and texting; any entry level phone will work as well as anything else on the market. It's the hand computer uses that differentiate the higher end models from each other. Reply
  • Dorek - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    "But the camera is a gimmick."

    The camera is one of the most important features of a smartphone. Every smartphone can competently make and receive phone calls. Every $20 flip phone can do that!
    Reply
  • maroon1 - Monday, April 6, 2015 - link

    S6 has faster CPU and GPU, and far better display.

    ALso, does all android games run on 1440p on S6 ?! I mean just because the display is 1440p that does not means that the game will run on native resolution.
    Reply
  • aenews - Tuesday, April 7, 2015 - link

    Most games will not have a problem with 1440P and most higher-end games have options to adjust the resolution. I don't know if any games would by default output in 1080P (although it may not make a difference in some games). Reply
  • ToTTenTranz - Monday, April 6, 2015 - link

    «There is also the issue of the “logo bar” bezel, but it’s physically impossible to get rid of this bezel due to engineering constraints.»

    I'm sorry Joshua but these are just HTC's claims and I call bollocks on that.
    Check the M9's teardown at ifixit and you'll see the PCBs have lots of free space everywhere and is oddly shaped for no apparent reason at all. The difference for the iphones and Galaxy Ses is astounding, where everything is a lot more compact and neatly organized.
    Nor is there any valid reason not to at least even out the black bar between top and bottom, making a symmetrical phone.

    At this point, the "HTC black bar" is just a result of lazy industrial design choice and/or incompetent PCB design, IMO.
    Reply
  • JoshHo - Monday, April 6, 2015 - link

    I've discussed the issue with people outside of HTC, and independently verified HTC's claim by checking multiple device teardowns.

    Fundamentally, the display driver is a large chip that must be coplanar with the display. It's possible to hide the appearance of this display driver, but there is a minimum level of bezel necessary to enable an active matrix display.
    Reply
  • Raniz - Monday, April 6, 2015 - link

    Yet, somehow, Sony's bezel is significantly smaller.

    http://i-cdn.phonearena.com/images/articles/138100...
    Reply
  • Connoisseur - Tuesday, April 7, 2015 - link

    Looking at that pic, the Z3 totally has a bezel that's about the same size as HTC's. It just doesn't have a front firing speaker... Speaker height + Bezel Height = Complaints about HTC bezel size? Reply
  • TrojMacReady - Tuesday, April 7, 2015 - link

    The Z3 has 2 front firing speakers, just like the HTC. They are even visible in the picture posted... Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now